How I shoot: Digital star trail photography

How I shoot star trail photography
By Robert on 11 Jan, 2014

There is plenty of information on the web about night photography and star trail photography. As I decided to immerse myself in the subject most information I found was contradictory and sometimes unclear, hence this post on the techniques I use.
Before we start, this is just how I do it; they're the methods I have tested and tried and applied to my workflow and equipment. Yours might differ, but I think you'll glean some useful information even if you have a different setup.

The first lesson learned

I embarked on my first star-shoot armed with a digital camera, a lockable shutter release cord and a tripod, thinking I'd just put my camera on the tripod in bulb mode, open the shutter for an hour and hope for star trails. The result was more than disheartening. Sure, I had star trails, but they were hardly apparent, and the image was full of digital noise and coloured blotches.

My first lesson: You can't take high-quality digital photos with excessive shutter speeds of 30 mins, an hour or more.
The imperfections and severe quality reduction in the images caused by something called Thermal Noise are created by the electronic camera sensor heating up during the exposure, making the noise and colours (called Hot Pixels) in the image.

There are a few ways of reducing digital noise in long exposure photography. The first I came across was the in-camera Long Exposure Noise Reduction (Long Exposure NR). This camera function effectively takes two photos, the first is your desired photograph and once complete, the camera takes a second but with the shutter closed. The second image is effectively a black photograph but will still show the same thermal noise build-up of the first image. Finally, the camera evaluates both images and subtracts the noise of the second image from the desired, first photo. Clever, indeed and it works to a degree. The downfall of this method is after, for example, a one-hour exposure the camera needs time to take another exposure which can also take up to another hour. Long star trails may require up to 2, 3 or 4 hours exposure time. Do you see the problem with this method? No, Long Exposure NR isn't going to work for star trails.

Star trails first attempt

The way forward

After this noise fiasco, I decided there is only one way to get quality long exposures, and that is not to take long exposures. The only way to capture digital, quality long star trails is to shoot lots of shorter exposures and merge them all in Photoshop to form one image.

Unfortunately, that knowledge opens up more problems because we need a way of taking maybe 200 or 400 images with exact similar exposures in precise intervals without moving the camera in any way. Now I was looking into buying a gadget specifically designed for this, called the Pclix XT, an Intervalometer which lets you do time-lapse photography. Around the same time, I was buying a new digital camera and ended up buying a Nikon D800. Imagine my surprise when I found out the D800 has a built-in Intervalometer...Christmas and Birthday at the same time.

The first hundred

It took a while to figure out the D800s Interval Timer Shooting function.  I'm not going to describe here because it's likely you have a different camera and also because it's a pain in the backside to get your head around, so try it at home in the warm before trying it out in the field. Chances are you may have to resort to the Pclix solution. (You sure don't want to be sitting next to the camera pushing the shutter release 400 times.)

The first result. Trails still a little shaky due to settings testing but otherwise a clean image.

Best camera settings for Star Trail Photography

Much information I found was a little contradictory, so here is a rundown of what I found works for me and why.

Aperture

I use the lowest f-number I can (largest aperture), usually f/2.8. You can get well-exposed images at smaller apertures, but I found the stars are not as clear and that's not what you want.

ISO

I use my lowest native ISO, which is 100 on the D800 (yeah, it goes to 50 but it's only simulated). You'll get the least amount of noise at the lowest ISO so going high isn't necessary. One issue with night photography is residual ambient light which can be exaggerated with higher ISOs and will overexpose your image quickly (more on that later).

Shutter speed

You'll need to be shooting in full manual mode so select your shutter speed. The in-camera exposure meter is relatively useless at night, so you'll need to play around and find what's best for your camera and lens combination. I generally shoot either 25 or 30-second exposures with a one-second interval.

File format

I always shoot raw...except for long exposures where I opt for jpg. The reason is the file size. You'll later be dealing with a lot of single images which will burn computer resources. Now my Mac is fast, but I like to keep the post-processing faster than the shoot.

White balance

I've played with different settings, but by far, my best pictures are in automatic white balance. I tried Tungsten to make the skies bluer but found it contaminated the star colour too much, and any foreground subjects were difficult to colour correct in post-processing.

Out in the field

It would help if you found something you want to photograph in the day time. Either scope out your subject several days before or go before sunset. Setting up in the evening light makes it easy to compose your image. The alternative of setting up in the dark is quite hard. Getting the right focus being the most significant hurdle as you don't want to spend two hours shooting off hundreds of images to find they're all not sharp.

So daylight set up is most accessible, but you'll have to wait a lot longer before you can shoot once the sun goes down. The reason is ambient light from the sun is still around up to and over an hour after sunset which will overexpose your first images.

I've found the best times to start shooting are around midnight where it's usually dark enough. I do like to take a couple of single shots earlier to give me some foreground detail which I edit in later in Photoshop.

Wrapping

We don't do dew

Probably one of the most significant issues with long night exposures is the build-up of dew on the lens, ruining the clarity of your images. Caused by the lens being colder than the ambient air temperature, dew is one of the biggest headaches you'll have to solve. Depending on the weather and time of year, be prepared to find a suitable solution as you will encounter this problem.

There are solutions out there for astronomers, but they're expensive. You can also find instructions for homemade electrical solutions on YouTube, but I don't want to carry more equipment and battery packs with me.

In my opinion, by far the most convenient and serviceable solution is the gel hand warmers from camping stores which, when secured around the lens, stay warm for up to an hour. They're held in place with a double-layered neoprene band and wrapped with thick bubble wrap for extra insulation. Not pretty, but it works. I also take my Giottos Rocket-air blower with me to blow the lens clear from time to time.

Other issues

Ambient light - from towns and villages (or even the sun) will give your photos a heavy orange tinge. It's best to find subjects as far away as possible from any form of street lighting, but it's going to be very hard to find areas with no ambient light unless you are lucky enough to live near a massive desert.

Boredom - If you can't set your camera up and go off to watch TV or sleep due to camera security, you'll need something to do to keep busy. I usually take my iPad with plenty to read or listen to for hours I'll be out.

Light - You'll need adequate lighting if you're off into the absolute darkness. A good lantern and a headlamp will do the trick nicely.

Post processing

So you're back in the warmth and sitting in front of the computer. I load all the images into Adobe Lightroom where I'll pick one of the lighter images and edit that to how I like it. Adding clarity and maybe tweaking colour temperature, high lights and shadows etc. From there, I'll copy and paste the develop settings to all the other images.

Starting from the end of the series of images I'll highlight around 20 to 30 and select "open as layers in Photoshop". In Photoshop, I change each layers blend mode to Lighten then merge those layers. Then select the next 20 to 30and repeat the process. The process of changing the blend mode to Lighten makes the star trails show through the image stack giving you the trails. Merge everything, and you have your photo.

You now have a comprehensive guide to getting started. The rest you'll have to play with and adapt to your workflow and equipment. 

UPDATE:

I have explained the confusing Intervalometer issue in my blog post Nikon D800 Intervalometer explained

Robert Rhead

About Robert Rhead

Robert Rhead is a English landscape photographer, UX/UI designer, web developer and graphic designer. He currently holds the LRPS certificate from the Royal Photographic Society, has won English and international photography awards and has featured in various high-profile photography and lifestyle magazines.

Comments

Emmanuel Schnetzler

Interesting article.
I assume you see the white pixels issue with long exposures on the D800 when turning off LENR? Is that something you need to spend a long time cleaning up? Do you clean the images before or after stacking?

Tue, 12/02/2014 - 15:53 Permalink
Robert

In reply to by Emmanuel Schnetzler

I find there isn't much of an issue with white pixels if I keep the exposure times to a max of 30 seconds. I never use in camera NR...that would also create dotted star trails. There is the occasional one or two but they are easily cleaned in post. I always so that cleaning after stacking.

Tue, 12/02/2014 - 15:59 Permalink
Milan Von Brunn

Thank you for sharing. I wish you would describe setting of intervalometer on D800 in detail.. No matter what I do, my in-camera intervalometer is not doing what it should. I set it to 999 clicks and when it starts shooting, it deducts 34 frames each activation. So I have to stay up all night resetting my shutter manually. I still got acceptable images but not being able to figure out this glitch boggles me to death. Thank you.

Tue, 12/02/2014 - 09:54 Permalink
Robert

In reply to by Milan Von Brunn

Yep...it's hard to get the hang of.....but the interval is the time from the first shutter release to the second shutter release...not the interval between closing the shutter and opening for the next frame. So...if you have your camera manually set to take 20-second exposures you need to set the interval for approx 22 seconds. If the interval is too short it simply skips lots of frames from your 99

Tue, 12/02/2014 - 17:23 Permalink
Milan Von Brunn

Sorry to report, but - again - D800 failed to shoot with built-in intervalometer. I printed out your instructions and went through the set up step by step - but with no success. This time, camera was skipping every other shot. Length of the skipped time was the total value of exposure and interval time. I was the only Nikon shooter there with four other Canon shooters. Canon shooters tried to help me with set up, but in the end they concurred that they are glad they don't own Nikon. Thanks God one of the Canon shooters had extra intervalometer control with 10-pin adapter and helped his fellow photographer in need. Not sure why Nikon makes that option available when you have to have PhDr in rocket science to set up your camera for interval shooting. Duh ! It doesn't make a bit of sense to me. I also hope, Nikon folks read these post as such things ruin their reputation big time. Moral of the story: If you own Nikon D800, always carry separate Intervalometer Control trigger. Thanks you for trying to help !

Mon, 03/23/2015 - 15:54 Permalink
Robert

In reply to by Milan Von Brunn

Sorry to hear you're still having problems with the D800 intervalometer. It might possibly be the write speed of your memory card that is causing the problem. I use 32GB Sandisk Extreme 60MB/s CF cards and I have no problems with having a 30 second exposure plus 3 seconds interval (33 seconds in total). If your card is slower then it may cause it to skip many frames as it can't write to the card in the interval time quick enough. Try a longer interval (5 seconds ...35 seconds in total with a 30 second exposure) or try a faster memory card.

Fri, 04/17/2015 - 17:23 Permalink
Catherine Lucas

I wonder why your iso is on 100 for stars... I in general find that astro photographers bump up their iso to 3200 or even 6400, especially with the Nikon and the available noise reduction game in camera. How can you get the same result with such a big difference in iso settings? I also shoot on 2.8 and between 20 and 25 sec, in some cases 30... Or am I missing a crucial point here? I did read your piece about the interval-o-meter and it is very clear and understandable. A lot better than the manual from the D800. Thanks. I live in New Mexico, USA, and have started taking star pics and huge cloud scenes. A total new field of pleasure and sitting in the desert at night under a sky loaden with zillions of them...

Tue, 06/07/2016 - 10:56 Permalink
Robert

In reply to by Catherine Lucas

Astro-photographers typically want fast and sharp photographs of stars that don't display any sign of trailing through their movement across the sky. To achieve that fast shutter speed at night they have to use high ISO values and then deal with the higher digital noise either with in-camera noise reduction or in post-processing. To achieve still star image the shutter speed must be under 10 seconds.

When we specifically try and photograph the trails that the movement of the stars creates we have more time available and can therefore afford to use much lower ISO values. We can use much longer shutter speeds ...25 - 30 seconds if needed.

Using in-camera noise reduction is not an option when using an intervalometer. The noise reduction takes a second photograph with the shutter closed after each frame to evaluate the noise and then subtract from the initial image. This can't be done with consecutive interval shooting.

Tue, 06/07/2016 - 17:23 Permalink
Kelly Fu

I've been experimenting and I have a new suggestion, thanks to your education helping my understanding of this timer. For dark sky photos and meteor showers, I recommend setting the camera at ### x 9 instead of x 1. That way you miss less meteors and get more sky time. My favorite setting with this is a 25 second shutter and a 3 minute and 55 second interval. This reduces the time better shutter clicks down to about 0.7 seconds instead of 2 or 3 seconds!!! The ninth frame ends up having about 1.5-2 seconds before the next set of 9, but you'd have that anyway between every one if you are doing it the ### x 1 way. The benefit is more meteors in frame AND a timer that lasts from dusk through dawn without running out of programmed frames. I hope this helps and works for you too.

Sun, 05/17/2020 - 16:56 Permalink

Add new comment

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.